Usage experience summary of major brand notebook

See many of my classmates talking about the laptop thing, think about notebook to our unit almost used all mainstream brand, I also spent a lot of brands, venture to summarize:

2, toshiba, more expensive, the quality is not good publicity, in fact our unit of Toshiba's often bad, the look is very general, and more and more in general, in particular, several paint, soil simply tooth, but also screen, previously said that Toshiba's screen is good, Some styles do not have the original screen, should pay attention to. Basic for senior leadership with a brand not play (at that age that Toshiba is good).

1, ibm, quality not to say that the price did not say, will not have any problems almost is like too earth (matter of opinion), or too conservative, especially in the confines of the screen, convex There hasp, ugly death . Suitable technical leadership to use, stable and worth.
3, hp / compaq, good value for money machine, the quality is also very stable, hp too Americanized, does not look good; the compaq relative quality is better, but look a little delicate. Our units only bad a charger, a bad contact. Used for real work, good performance, and not play.

4, sony, notebook Xinjun, quasi rubbish! Several of our units almost from head to toe are bad, only powder the Siha × family what will be sought after, basic laptop use in the more than 10-year history of people will not look at the. Suitable for leadership with ultra-portable, looks just fine, and leadership in the hands of dc dv compatible, a brand thing. Small bag put on the line, only for the basic report with, not the intensity of use (you want to just put ppt released a bunch of problems, the real work of the people can count on it).

Dell pc764 battery Dell pt434 battery Dell pw823 battery